Sunday, October 29, 2006

Go forth and multiply

http://buttdarling.multiply.com/journal

Dear LiveJournal user pro2, Thank you for your reply. The subject line, "Christopher Darby needs killing," is indeed the piece of content we are referring to as being inciteful of violence, as the casual observer would read it to mean that you are encouraging individuals to kill Christopher Darby. Editing the entry to remove such references would be considered appropriate compliance as per the e-mail you received. Additionally, for privacy- and security-related reasons, we are unable to discuss with you the identity of the individual who reported you to the LiveJournal Abuse Team. Regards, Melisande LiveJournal Abuse Team Did this answer your question? YES: http://www.livejournal.com/support/etc NO: http://www.livejournal.com/support/etc If you are having problems using any of the links in this email, please try copying and pasting the *entire* link into your browser's address bar rather than clicking on it.

Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 8:36 PM Did you get my email offering to withdraw the heading yet? I will do this under protest while I make arrangements to move to a less arbitary and censorious blog environment. Any ' casual' reader can leave a comment under any of my posts to clarify any ambiguity. Also I believe any vexatious complainant should be put in direct touch with the accused as this is natural justice 101. The accused has a right to confront their accuser and settle their concerns before any formal proceedings are commenced - let alone sanctions! You are leaving yrself wide open for a quite disturbing ' Star chamber' style of abrupt censorship of an entire year or mores work and that is totally unacceptable. Maybe for some sort of 'enlightened-despotism' it could be acceptable but I thought you were better than that for some reason. Anyway please give me my 24 hours to fix this and then enough time to move right out. You make me sick and the smell in here is making me sicker.

Live journal Nazi's at work

Dear LiveJournal user pro2,

Thank you for your reply. The subject line, "Christopher Darby needs
killing," is indeed the piece of content we are referring to as being
inciteful of violence, as the casual observer would read it to mean that
you are encouraging individuals to kill Christopher Darby. Editing the
entry to remove such references would be considered appropriate
compliance as per the e-mail you received.

Additionally, for privacy- and security-related reasons, we are unable
to discuss with you the identity of the individual who reported you to
the LiveJournal Abuse Team.

Regards,
Melisande
LiveJournal Abuse Team

Did this answer your question?
YES:
http://www.livejournal.com/support/etc
NO:
http://www.livejournal.com/support/etc

If you are having problems using any of the links in this email, please
try copying and pasting the *entire* link into your browser's address
bar rather than clicking on it.

Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 8:36 PM

Did you get my email offering to withdraw the heading yet?

I will do this under protest while I make arrangements to move to a less arbitary and censorious blog environment. Any ' casual' reader can leave a comment under any of my posts to clarify any ambiguity. Also I believe any vexatious complainant should be put in direct touch with the accused as this is natural justice 101.

The accused has a right to confront their accuser and settle their concerns before any formal proceedings are commenced - let alone sanctions!

You are leaving yrself wide open for a quite disturbing ' Star chamber' style of abrupt censorship of an entire year or mores work and that is totally unacceptable. Maybe for some sort of 'enlightened-despotism' it could be acceptable but I thought you were better than that for some reason.

Anyway please give me my 24 hours to fix this and then enough time to move right out. You make me sick and the smell in here is making me sicker.

True story

There was this president from Texas in the sixties who was famous for her loud mouthed rants delivered while astride a toilet. She once famously accused a perceived opponent of relentlessly buggering a sow. While informed that the individual concerned was not into beastiality she then said, ' Yeah sure...I know that! But just let the sonuvabitch deny it!'
Well I can't deny anything you've said yet darling Enema CointelPRO.

I did fuck a sow up the arse once - I cannot tell a lie.

So I dobbed her in. Receipt no 12862541 means that at least she's right about one thing - I am a police informant...even if it took her repeated reminders. Thanks sweetheart - one good turn deserves another.

Just do us all a favour and get a blood test will you. You are freaking people out.

Saturday, October 28, 2006

No appeal - no natural justice.

The following post has status hidden:( @ Melbourne Indymedia )

Attempt to gag Aussie blogger
by pr • Friday October 27, 2006 at 05:16 PM

Well it was only a matter of time before the same ' Manchurian global' chickens that helped build the Golden Shield came home to roost

And on top of that the last empires, military-entertainment complex just declared war in cyberspace as well!
The timing to gag bloggers in the free world is a sign of just how desperate the last empire truly is. To think that we would just forget that millions died in WW2 so that we could express our opinions freely!

How pathetic of them. Here is whats happened so far...
Dear LiveJournal user pro2,

It has recently come to our attention that your journal entry, located
at http://pro2.livejournal.com/1634340.html, contains incitement to
cause violence on another individual. This is a violation of the Terms of
Service (http://www.livejournal.com/legal/tos.bml), to which you agreed
when you created your account.

As such, we must require that you delete the entry as soon as possible,
but no later than Saturday, October 27th 2006 at 12:01AM EDT. Failure
to do so by this deadline will result in further action being taken
against your account.

Regards,
Melisande
LiveJournal Abuse Team

RESPONDED...

Sorry but I just don't see it.
Could you please specify where the incitement is exactly?
If you take the comment heading the wrong way I suppose that could mean I think Chris needs killing but thats not what I meant. I mean the organization he works for obviously needs kidnapping, torturing and yes, killing to maintain its funding. I can't help the fact that any language contains ambiguity but if you be a little more specific then I can edit the entry in a spirit of good faith and diplomatic compromise.
Also as confronting yr accuser is a well known and sound principle of natural justice and good faith dealings in any free democracy I would like to know who complained about this obvious misunderstanding. By dealing with them directly I might then help free up yr staff for more important and substantive breachs.
Yrs cordially
professor rat

I've received a reciept number for that response and will report further developments here when they pry my cold stiff fingers from the touchpad. Anyone aware of a blogging service that does not harrass it's members with vexatious and frivolous complaints - similar to that received by the ABC - then I would appreciate yr leads. TIA.
DAY LATER - checked email and should add that the receipt no I got was machine generated. I still have no response to my appeal for natural justice above and this looks pretty machine generated as well...

Dear LiveJournal user pro2,

On October 24th, 2006, we sent you an e-mail indicating that your
journal entry, located at http://pro2.livejournal.com/1634340.html, violated
the Terms of Service as it contained incitement to cause violence to
another individual. As you have failed to remove the incitement by the
deadline specified, we have been forced to suspend your account.

If you would like to have your account unsuspended, please reply back
to this e-mail with a date and time, including timezone, preferably 24
hours in advance when you will be available to remove the offending
content. Your journal will be unsuspended for 24 hours so that you may do
so.

Regards,
Melisande
LiveJournal Abuse Team

Now I've offered to scratch the whole post ( and will move it here asap ) so that is the state of play. I've also asked them if they got my first email. This process stinks if all the Saudies, Chinese or CIA have to do is complain anonymously to remove a blogger. Live journal you are not looking good at this point - please restore my faith in human nature, inalienable human and civil rights and natural justice by providing a little basic, bedrock, elementary due process post-dark ages.
TIA - pr

Live journal suspend blogger

No appeal - no natural justice.

The following post has status hidden:( @ Melbourne Indymedia )

Attempt to gag Aussie blogger
by pr • Friday October 27, 2006 at 05:16 PM

Well it was only a matter of time before the same ' Manchurian global' chickens that helped build the Golden Shield came home to roost

And on top of that the last empires, military-entertainment complex just declared war in cyberspace as well!
The timing to gag bloggers in the free world is a sign of just how desperate the last empire truly is. To think that we would just forget that millions died in WW2 so that we could express our opinions freely!

How pathetic of them. Here is whats happened so far...
Dear LiveJournal user pro2,

It has recently come to our attention that your journal entry, located
at http://pro2.livejournal.com/1634340.html, contains incitement to
cause violence on another individual. This is a violation of the Terms of
Service (http://www.livejournal.com/legal/tos.bml), to which you agreed
when you created your account.

As such, we must require that you delete the entry as soon as possible,
but no later than Saturday, October 27th 2006 at 12:01AM EDT. Failure
to do so by this deadline will result in further action being taken
against your account.

Regards,
Melisande
LiveJournal Abuse Team

RESPONDED...

Sorry but I just don't see it.
Could you please specify where the incitement is exactly?
If you take the comment heading the wrong way I suppose that could mean I think Chris needs killing but thats not what I meant. I mean the organization he works for obviously needs kidnapping, torturing and yes, killing to maintain its funding. I can't help the fact that any language contains ambiguity but if you be a little more specific then I can edit the entry in a spirit of good faith and diplomatic compromise.
Also as confronting yr accuser is a well known and sound principle of natural justice and good faith dealings in any free democracy I would like to know who complained about this obvious misunderstanding. By dealing with them directly I might then help free up yr staff for more important and substantive breachs.
Yrs cordially
professor rat

I've received a reciept number for that response and will report further developments here when they pry my cold stiff fingers from the touchpad. Anyone aware of a blogging service that does not harrass it's members with vexatious and frivolous complaints - similar to that received by the ABC - then I would appreciate yr leads. TIA.
DAY LATER - checked email and should add that the receipt no I got was machine generated. I still have no response to my appeal for natural justice above and this looks pretty machine generated as well...

Dear LiveJournal user pro2,

On October 24th, 2006, we sent you an e-mail indicating that your
journal entry, located at http://pro2.livejournal.com/1634340.html, violated
the Terms of Service as it contained incitement to cause violence to
another individual. As you have failed to remove the incitement by the
deadline specified, we have been forced to suspend your account.

If you would like to have your account unsuspended, please reply back
to this e-mail with a date and time, including timezone, preferably 24
hours in advance when you will be available to remove the offending
content. Your journal will be unsuspended for 24 hours so that you may do
so.

Regards,
Melisande
LiveJournal Abuse Team

Now I've offered to scratch the whole post ( and will move it here asap ) so that is the state of play. I've also asked them if they got my first email. This process stinks if all the Saudies, Chinese or CIA have to do is complain anonymously to remove a blogger. Live journal you are not looking good at this point - please restore my faith in human nature, inalienable human and civil rights and natural justice by providing a little basic, bedrock, elementary due process post-dark ages.
TIA - pr

Saturday, August 05, 2006

ZIONAZI KERRY STOKES THREATENS INDY!

The infamous criminal terrorist Kerry Stokes is threatening Indymedia with Singapore style totalitarian repression through the courts.

Typical behaviour from this low scummy fascist filth. SEE...

Dear Sirs
Mr Kerry Stokes
We act for Kerry Stokes who has been made aware of an article attributed to you on the Melbourne Indymedia website http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/116036_comment.php
The article is grossly defamatory of Mr Stokes. For example, it asserts he is a criminal and supplies funding to terrorists. On our instructions, the article is indefensible and Mr Stokes is entitled to expect a substantial verdict from the Court if proceedings are commenced.
Blah, blah, blah,etc, preliminary proceedings can be commenced against your Internet Service Provider to compel them to disclose details identifying your name and address.
( Iprimus say this isn't a problem...' we like to help the police')
Our client requests you take the appropriate steps for the immediate removal of the article from the Melbourne Indymedia website. If you refuse to comply with this request, our client will rely on this letter in any application he makes for aggravated and exemplary damages should proceedings be commenced.
In the meantime, our clients reserves his rights.
Yours faithfully etc...[Sgd] Mallesons Scumbags Stephen Jaques ( early August)

http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/116036_comment.php

The following post has status hidden:

Deleted
by deleted • Monday July 03, 2006 at 05:37 PM

deleted - MIM eds

Sheesh - So was this the deleted epistle?

Kerry Stokes is an appalling human being and a terrible man - it's official. Kerry Stokes, Australia & New Zealand's 40 Richest - Forbes.com.
Kerry Stokes ranked 7 among Australia & New Zealand's 40 Richest In 2006. He owns WesTrac, one of the largest Caterpillar equipment dealers, with operations in Australia and northern China. Westrac, with a Caterpillar dealership in northeast China, has sales of $1bn a year. Seven Network media boss Kerry Stokes owns the company.

"Stokes is a terrible man and a terrible businessman. Everyone who has come into contact with him knows that he is an appalling human being."

Chief executive of Publishing and Broadcasting Limited, John Alexander.

Is Jill Singer a scat prostitute?
by pr • Friday June 16, 2006 at 02:10 AM

Im asking this because I love her so much I want her to improve her situation. Things could only look up...

Jills career so far includes an endless amount of spruiking for the inane crapology of Aussie rules, a marriage of sorts with Kerry Stokes ( see below) and recent appearences with the master of fascist disaster, Jon Faine. Were she to take up scat submission in a specialized Sydney brothel she could hardly do better.

I was reminded of the stoked lady by this...

Caterpillar Pressured Over 'Weaponized Bulldozers'
by Emad Mekay

The parents of a U.S. peace activist who was crushed to death by an Israeli bulldozer built by the global machinery giant Caterpillar confronted the company Wednesday for the first time and urged shareholders at its annual meeting to end sales of "weaponized bulldozers to Israel."

Cindy and Craig Corrie, parents of the late Rachel Corrie, attended the meeting as proxy voters on behalf of Jewish and Christian institutional investors who have filed a resolution asking for greater corporate accountability from Caterpillar.

Activists supporting the parents who lost their daughter in 2003 say that the company sells machinery to the Israeli army in violation of its corporate accountability pledge and knowing full well that the equipment will be used for the destruction of Palestinian homes and farms.

"We are part of a growing movement for corporate responsibility in the United States," said Matt Gaines of the STOP CAT campaign in a telephone interview from outside the shareholders' meeting in Chicago.

"Getting the U.S. government to take action on this issue has been very, very difficult, even though we are still working on it. But we are taking it directly to the corporations involved that are sponsoring, aiding, or abetting war crimes," he said.

Caterpillar has become the poster child for U.S. companies that are being targeted in divestment drives for their role in human rights abuses by the Israeli army in occupied Palestinian land. It has said in the past that it bears no responsibility for how its products are used by clients. Spokespersons from the company were not immediately available for comment on Wednesday.

Rachel Corrie was killed in the town of Rafah while she and other members of the International Solidarity Movement were trying to stop the demolition of a Palestinian house in the Gaza Strip on March 16, 2003.

Caterpillar, Inc. built the nine-ton bulldozer that ran over Corrie, a 23-year-old college student from Olympia, Wash. Her death made international headlines and triggered widespread condemnation. Israeli courts have yet to prosecute anyone for the incident.

The Illinois-based Caterpillar, which had annual sales and revenues of $36 billion last year – more than half from overseas business – has been reluctant to disclose how much money it makes from its dealings with Israel.

Peace activists estimate that since Israel occupied Arab land in the 1967 war, Caterpillar bulldozers have illegally razed the homes of more than 50,000 Palestinians. They say that in the past five years alone, Caterpillar equipment was used to uproot over one million olive trees owned by Palestinians.

The U.S. company has been repeatedly singled out by international human rights bodies such as the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch for complicity in rights abuses in the occupied Palestinian land.

But it is the divestment campaign – mostly led by Christian institutional investors, including the Presbyterian Church USA, the World Council of Churches, the Church of England, and the Church of Scotland – that has most alarmed right-wing pro-Israel groups and the company.

The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, a right-wing Zionist organization, says that Corrie and other peace activists were hindering the army's work to track down suspected terrorists and weapons smugglers.

Peace activists counter that as well as homes and roads, the Israeli army destroys olive trees, farmland, and even water wells, hardly hideouts for terrorist suspects. They point to a number of actions that have aimed to muzzle publicity given to Corrie's death.

Recently, a play about Rachel Corrie's life that had two successful runs in London was banned from the New York Theater Workshop after protests from some Jewish groups.

Copies of the play, composed of letters and journal entries, and titled My Name Is Rachel Corrie, were taken off bookshelves and only a few are now available in the United States, the campaigners say.

And when Corrie's parents called on the State Department to investigate the killing, their plea was rebuffed.

Writing in the conservative Jerusalem Post, Elwood McQuaid, a self-styled "Christian Zionist" who served as the executive director of The Friends of Israel Ministry in the U.S., characterized the corporate responsibility campaign as part of a leftist conspiracy.

"What is at issue here has little to do with moral justice; but it has much to do with radical, liberal, leftist obsession," the pastor wrote.

His words have not dissuaded Christian groups from discussing the issue further on Christian and moral grounds. An intense debate is going on in Birmingham, Ala., where thousands of delegates to the Presbyterian General Assembly are to decide on future steps in their divestment drive.

Christian Zionist groups have also argued that divestment is the wrong approach and called for more investments to build neighborly relations between Palestinians and the Israelis.

But last week, the National Middle Eastern Presbyterian Caucus of the Presbyterian Church said in a statement that while a positive investment strategy can be constructive, it fails "to stop the Israeli government from confiscating Palestinian property and expropriating Palestinian land." END ARTICLE

A quick search reveals that who the local dealer is.

Kerry Stokes.

Maybe I'm being to harsh on Jill.

Maybe she is a recovering footieholic.

Maybe she even broke up with Kerry over him bulldozing her in bed.

Maybe she is ever-so-subtley undermining and sabotaging the Jon Faine fascist half hour.

I still reckon she'd be better off working as an honest shit whore. The work would be cleaner. END
pro2@optusnet.com.etc
printer friendly version | 132 reads

IANAL ( obviously ) but I understand that the owners of a BBS can't be held legally liable for everyfinks wots published there.
As the author I accept responsibilty but we are not living in Communist China or Fascist Singapore quite yet no matter how hard the creepy criminal scumbags like John Howard, Alan Jones and Kerry Stokes try.

Fuck them and their boat load of lawyers.

Friday, March 03, 2006

Peter and Mr Wolf

Costellos pitiful moment
Greg Sheriden - the Australian
Peter Costello was a shallow, lazy and opportunistic Treasurer who did not deserve to run the country. Costello's foolish gratuitous, undisciplined and slyly offensive comment's about Muslim's in his windy speech on citizenship last week may well signal a change in the way he intends to pursue the prime ministership.
Instead of differentiating himself from John Howard on the left, Costello now seemed to be trying to differentiate himself on the right.
In his speech Costello was doing exactly what extremists wanted him to do - allowing them to define Muslim identity by equating the most extreme form of Islamic radicalism with Muslim's generally.
No wonder he was warmly applauded by Pauline Hanson.
Costello claims he's a great treasurer because the economy is doing well.
An alternative view was that he's been a lucky treasurer and a lazy treasurer, a high-taxing, high-spending treasurer with a modest reform record. That he is prepared to play around so irresponsibly on race and religion to further his leadership ambitions represents his most pitiful moment in politics.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

Peter Costello - portrait of a pig

Australian Cabinet Minister Suggests Gays Lucky Not To Be Arrested

Sydney, Australia) A senior Australian cabinet minister has outraged gays and lesbians by suggesting they should give up the fight for same-sex marriage and be content that homosexuality is no longer a crime.

During a gathering of the Sydney Institute, a conservative think tank that holds regular public seminars and panel discussions, Treasurer Peter Costello was questioned by a lesbian couple about his government's refusal to consider either marriage or civil partnerships.

The couple, Dr. Kerryn Phelps, a former president of the Australian Medical Association, and partner Jackie Stricker, were married in 1998 in a ceremony that is not recognized by the government.

Costello said that his government was right in blocking legalized unions for gay couples because marriage should only apply to opposite-sex partnerships.

The cabinet minister said gay partners have the right to access each other's pensions and that was about as far as the government was prepared to go.

He then said that "I think we do recognize the rights of gay and lesbian people in Australia. We do not criminalize conduct or behavior."

"I thought that was appalling. It was offensive. I found it suggesting that we were lucky that we weren't being thrown in jail," Stricker told the Australian Associated Press.

"We have in this country vast number of families with same sex couples as the parents. Their children don't have the same rights, the individuals in those relationships don't have the same rights, as people in heterosexual marriages."

Last year the Australian government passed legislation last year defining marriage as between a man and a woman. END

The same week this swine lashed out at Muslim Australians stridently insulting them in his arrogant racist manner. ' Love it or leave it'. The last refuge of the scoundrel and fittingly flattered by arch-fascist Pauline Hanson.

Peter Costello now stands starkly exposed for what he has been all along - a flying fascist pig that now needs severe puncturing. END

My day to day blog btw is at pro2 livejournal.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Direct action against the state

A challenge to all the plastic fascists
by pr Wednesday January 11, 2006 at 02:47 AM

This is a direct action against the ALP/ Lib/Gnat/ FF/Dem/GP/SA, etc statists. All of them. The government - the state - the Aussi Taliban. FUCK YOU!

I HEREBY, with full knowledge of the laws and penalties contained in Schedule 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Bill (No. 2) 2005, urge all readers of this column to arm themselves with the nearest blunt instrument, storm Parliament House and overthrow the Australian government by force.

( For easier updating I'm mainly using my live journal so try...

http://www.livejournal.com/users/pro2/

Do I seriously advocate violence, having become so angry that I have lost all sense of proportion, or am I using these words as a device to point out, "in good faith", an error or defect in the government of the commonwealth?

The answer to that question will determine whether you have to continue to put up with my column this year, or whether you don't hear from me again until I get out of prison in 2012.

The Anti-Terrorism Bill passed through both houses of Parliament late last year, so treason and sedition laws, together with seven-year prison terms, are now part of the law of the land in this country.

When ACT Chief Minister Jon Stanhope made the first cut of this Bill public via his website, against the express wishes of the Prime Minister, I held his actions up as an outstanding example of e-democracy, illustrating how the web has given an enormous boost to democratic processes by enabling immediate and widespread public access to information critical to the public interest.

Had Stanhope not done it, the general public would have been locked out of the debate, civil liberties groups and law associations would not have been able to prepare submissions, and the Bill probably would not have been amended.

Australians probably didn't get much democracy for their money in the end, given the minimal parliamentary debate, lack of ticker on the part of Labor and the fact that so many proposed amendments were simply dismissed out of hand, but they got something.

The original version, for example, included "bringing the sovereign into hatred or contempt" under seditious intention, so at least die-hard republicans can now celebrate their continuing right to mock the Queen.

The sedition laws are going to affect plenty of people who operate in cyberspace.

Young antiwar bloggers who habitually post emotive diatribes against the government might need some judicial counselling on language and style. Website administrators will need to think harder about content they host, or mirror, from anti-government sources.

No doubt Australian internet service providers will at some point be asked to participate in the enforcement process, as has already happened with pornographic content.

A conscious effort from all of these people, plus a dose of moral fortitude, may be necessary to prevent provocative, healthy dissent from being neutered in coming years.

I've trawled through the 137 pages of clauses and subclauses of the final Bill and there is still too much latitude for misuse, misinterpretation and mistakes.

While an improvement over version 1.0, the document remains a class A exhibit for ignorance, and that special type of amnesia that makes politicians block out historical precedents.

The mantra of "give us these powers and trust us to use them wisely" just doesn't cut it.

What's wrong with writing good laws now? If Mr Ruddock ever bothered to read this column, I expect he would dismiss the opening sentence as self-righteous, irrelevant piffle from a third-rate computer scientist, and he would probably be right on all counts.

But who will be doing the interpreting in three years, in what climate of fear and in what political circumstances?

I have to go now, because some men in dark suits are knocking at the door.

Bruce McCabe is an independent technology analyst and managing director of S2 Intelligence. END EXTRACT

On indulgence I request this article be reposted as a direct action challenge to the stupid pack of racist statist Galah's in Canberra to either put up or shut up. Bruce and I are calling yr bluff arseholes. Either you are the type of fascist fucks who are up to snuff or ...we call yr bluff right here - right now.

We know you chickenshits don't have the balls to go all the way so eat shit fuck off and die all you Liberal, gNat's, Family First arsefuckers and all yr hanging dags and running vomit eating dogs. Especially those vomit eating dogs like Mick Keelty.

You are GUTLESS!

We called you out and you piked you yellow stinking maggots!

FUCK YOU and all who sail in you. And fuck the brownosing corpse media - your all dead meat talking. Don't you know we're talkin bout a revolution.

And we are long past whispering.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Party Pooper or Magic Pudding?

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/12/101180.php

Peter Costello Overqualified?

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/12/101174.php

Poor Peter pooped