Thursday, December 08, 2005

Party Pooper or Magic Pudding?

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/12/101180.php

Peter Costello Overqualified?

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/12/101174.php

Poor Peter pooped

Saturday, December 03, 2005

All of us are lying in the gutters...

...but only one of us is looking up Gerard's arse.

Latest Hot Poop on Pete News Squad

The NS News room is banging like a dunny door in a hurricane tonight with all the latest on the swelling tumescent Peter Costello sex scandal.

Petomane Costello - Australian rules ' Back pocket' legend. News Squad
When asked what they would do if Jesus returned the Liberal Party replied...' move Peter Costello to the Lodge?'

Hard Core Costello nominated for Porn ' Oscar's' News Squad
Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?

First gay prime minister soon News Squad
Australia may soon have the first openly Gay prime minister...so what changes, if any, might we expect?

Peter Costello - The Pink Panzer M Kroger
' Who best understands us queer Nazi's? '

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/?display=f

Peter the great

18 good Globocop's

Saturday, December 03, 2005

18 GIs killed in 72 Hours
Anti-Prison Demonstrations in Baghdad

From Wednesday to Friday, guerrillas in Iraq killed 18 US troops. The most tragic single incident came on Friday, when guerrillas used old Baath rocket parts to make an enormous bomb that killed 10 Marines near Fallujah and wounded 11. CNN points out that Marine convoys tend to spread out to limit such casualties, so the death of 10 GIs in one incident suggests just a horrific explosion. There were said to be 600,000 tons of munitions stored in Iraq, one of the more militarized societies in the world, and over 200,000 tons are probably still unaccounted for.

On Wednesday, four GIs had been killed in separate incidents.

On Friday, as well, over a thousand Shiites and Sunnis held joint Friday prayers services and then mounted demonstrations downtown. The prayers were held at the mosque of Abu Hanifah in Adhamiyah. They demonstrated against the continued US military sweeps [of places like Ramadi].

Al-Zaman says that they were demanding the trial of the official in charge of the Jadiriyah Prison where 150 largely Sunni detainees had been tortured and starved. They said that Abu Karim Alwandi, the head of intelligence for the Badr Corps paramilitary, who presided over Jadiriyah, had to be held to the rule of law. Some placards angrily charged that Iraqis had been tortured on Iranian orders. This allegation comes about because the prison was in the charge of the Ministry of Interior, controlled by Bayan Jabr Sulagh, a prominent member of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, which had been based in Iran 1982-2003. Some placards accused the minister of being an American puppet. The crowds also demanded the release of detainees held by the US in Iraq.

The Shiites involved were likely followers of Muqtada al-Sadr, who have a rivalry with SCIRI and who have sometimes engaged in a politics of pan-Islam, hooking up with Sunni fundamentalists for anti-imperial purposes.

posted by Juan @ 12/03/2005 06:30:00 AM 0 comments
Friday, December 02, 2005

Guerrillas Gather at Ramadi
US Riposte

Iraq has banned non-Iraqi Arabs from coming to Iraq in the build-up to the December 15 elections. I think they would have been better off banning all civilians of any nationality from coming in; this way of doing it smacks of racism.

Aljazeera is reporting, based on video released by guerrillas that the latter have taken over Ramadi and attacked US troops there. I saw on CNN International a rebuttal of this claim by Gen. Lynch, who alleged that the Zarqawi group is very good at propaganda and is obscuring what is really going on in Iraq. He said that on the day the videotape claimed there were several attacks on US positions around Ramadi, there was actually just one rocket propelled grenade attack on a US base.

My suspicion is that the truth lies in the middle. FROM Juan Cole @ Informed comment

Smell that Victory!

Friday, December 02, 2005

Chimp didn't fall far from the tree

Barbara Bush is allegedly TICKED off at Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Andy Card, nearly all of them -- except Karen Hughes -- for how her boy is faring in the hearts and minds of Americans.

The matriarch of the Bush clan is colder than North Pole ice right now to those around her son who she thinks have undermined him. I'll tell who my sources are if Patrick Fitzgerald gives a call and makes me -- but the sources are very close to Poppa Bush (41), who has been traveling a bit with some of his old entourage, including Brent Scowcroft and others of the first Bush regime.

While TWN has been able to confirm that Laura Bush's mother-in-law wants to do more than put coal in the stockings of the Vice President and the other top handlers of her son's White House, we have not been able to confirm a slightly stronger bit of the rumor, which is that Barbara -- not Laura -- was planning to call on Nancy Reagan just to get a refresher lesson on how she took on and kicked out then Chief-of-Staff Donald Regan. (I embellish here; Barbara Bush is not going to take lessons from Nancy, it just sounded good. My source told me that Barbara was about to "pull a Nancy Reagan" on these attendants.)

Cheney may be tougher to dump than Don Regan, but then again, Barbara Bush is one of those wonders of nature (we hear) who knows no limits and can easily surge beyond category 5 hurricane winds.

Should be interesting to watch the role of the First Mother in the coming couple of months. Watch for a lot to change right after the State of the Union address, I've been told.

Steve Clemons - Posted by steve at December 1, 2005

Bar is evil incarnate, but take on Big Time? Don't think so.

Posted by: Red_Neck_Repub at December 1, 2005 06:35 PM

Wasn't it Nixon who said of Barbara Bush,
"She really knows how to hate"?

Posted by: Buford P. Stinkleberry at December 1, 2005 06:43 PM

Poor Babs! people are picking on her little boy. He's getting sticks and stones thrown at him.

To bad, he didn't serve his time in the service. Maybe, just maybe he'd have learned how to cope with out his Mommy

Posted by: gwili brunner

Pardon me for not sparing too many drops of my heart's blood for poor outraged Bar, or Poppy, or even Saint Laura Dostoevsky. Those people knew better than anyone else that Georgie's great gift in life is for stepping on his own scrotum -- I've mislaid the article in which Laura was described as saying her husband was incapable of changing a light switch -- and they could have put the kibosh on his presidential ambitions, had they so chosen. But, no; THE DYNASTY had to prevail, and so here we are. As for Bar's housecleaning: Card's ready to bail anyway, Rove's on a slow boat to indictment anyway, and Cheney's not going anywhere without a shove from Fitzgerald.

Posted by: penalcolony at December 1, 2005 07:28 PM

She doesn't care about George. It's Jeb she's worried about. If the Bush name gets dragged through the mud thoroughly enough, the dynasty's next emperor won't be able to rise to the throne.

Posted by: Garbo
Having Barbara Bush gunning for you is the stuff nightmares are made of. I wish Steve hadn't of posted this, I may wake up in cold sweats imagining her looming in my bedroom doorway with an ax. Perhaps I better rethink my habit of calling her little darling "Monkey Boy".

Barbara, if you're reading this, trust me, I understand. The poor little man is doing the best he can with what God gave him, and I apologize if I have been too harsh on the poor dear. In the future I will try to refrain from insulting his lack of brains and integrity, and will focus my disdain on the evil doers around him that have maliciously taken advantage of his mental handicaps.

Perhaps you could recommend Ala-non to those in his immmediate sphere, and they might know better how to treat the little dear.

Posted by: Pissed Off American at December 1, 2005 08:05 PM

She doesn't care about George. It's Jeb she's worried about. If the Bush name gets dragged through the mud thoroughly enough, the dynasty's next emperor won't be able to rise to the throne.

No doubt.

Country or La Familia Bush?
The choice for this crime family is simple.

That is EXACTLY what the Harriet Miers nomination was all about. You never can tell when your family might need a Supreme Court Justice.

Aunt Harriet, gushing over Boy George, could be trusted to do the family's bidding for years and years.

Posted by: koreyel at December 1, 2005 08:06 PM

She' gonna go Nurse Wratchet on their asses.
Rove will end up throwing Washington's marble bust through a West Wing window in order to escape her shock therapy.

Posted by: draculich
Young Babs = Angela Lansbury in The Manchurian Candidate.

Posted by: Bill Brock - Chicago at December 1, 2005 09:56 PM

A real man doesn't get his elderly Mom to clean up his messes.

Pathetic. At least Jonah Goldberg will understand.

Posted by: Tim B. at December 1, 2005 10:32 PM

This could be the stuff of Wagnerian opera - Bar as The Valkyrie?

Posted by: Jim Faith
Even with Ronnie in the early stages of Alzheimers Nancy made sure VP Bush never got close to power. She figures out, correctly, that allowing VP Bush to get close to power would cause complications for her husband. Nancy kept VP Bush castrated and at arms lenght throughout Ronnie's presidency. She also did not allow anyone on her husband's staff to get too powerful.

Laura seems more like the Pat Nixon type. She looks and acts like a Stepford Wife.

I don't think Babs will get anywhere with Cheney. Not with Lynne around. She has met her match with Lynne. They are both mean and vicious.

Posted by: Nan
I hope we will all keep in mind that today 4 MORE American soldiers were MURDERED in Iraq today by the actions of her coke sniffing AWOL COWARD of a son. 4 more DEAD. Four more families wracked BY GRIEF over the holidays. Four more mothers, fathers, wifes, sons or daughters who will mourn the UNNECCESARY death of their loved one.

And, as Cindy Sheehan would ask of this lying son of a bitch in the White House.....

WHAT IS THE NOBLE CAUSE THEY DIED FOR????

AND WHY WON'T THIS PATHETIC EXCUSE OF A MAN MEET WITH SHEEHAN AND ANSWER HER QUESTIONS???

(And, how many Iraqis DIED TODAY because of this coward's actions??? Oh, gee, thats right, we don't keep count.)

Posted by: Pissed Off American at December 1, 2005 11:51 PM

Cheney will be joining Dan Quayle and Dana Carvey on the dead-player pile...may turn up in a Moby video...

Posted by: Ace Loves Gary at December 1, 2005 11:55 PM

A lady who went to my church (in ALaska) that I knew casually dated GW while he was up there in the 70s. I didn't get there until 82, but I heard stories of the white powder flowing. I'm not talking about snow. And what did this lady
and GW do on dates? Drink of course! I also heard second hand that she was very worried when
he became President.

Posted by: librarylady at December 1, 2005 11:56 PM

First they have to get to the State of the Union address.

Posted by: ll
Richard M. Nixon said of this woman, "That is a woman who really knows how to hate!" Kind of makes a person wonder what she has in store for old Dick and CO. We are so lucky to be living in such times you can't pay for entertainment like this.

Posted by: Craig
hate to burst everyone's balloons, but according to the t.v. Dick Chicanery will be out giving three speeches for Bu$h this coming week, so it looks like Mr. insider has been fed a line of crap.

And BeelzaBaBs Bu$h apparently still has no influence with Georgie, he will keep the pals he runs with, screw his reputation, he's only there for the money and Dick delivers.

Posted by: Shannon
Babs is one mean bitch. I hold her personally responsible for the anti-intellectual position of the rest of her family--43 was reasonably well educated and had a head on his shoulders, but 41-W is dumb as a stump.

On the other hand, looking over the comments so far, I share the general sentiment that if there is anyone who has the balls to rip off Cheney's, it's Bab's. Of course, Lynne may already have them in a jar hidden somewhere right next to his heart in another jar. The good news, 43 is on anti-psychotics, Laura's on downers, Dick's on nitro--to say the least, and TurdBlossom's on a hot seat. Babs could still use something to fix her thyroid herself, but all she has to do is play keepaway with Cheney's meds and she can easily outlast him at that game. :-0

Posted by: buck turgidson
That blue haired battle ax is indeed a bitch and the Chimp didn't fall far from his tree. I think some of their problems are genetic.

Read Justin A. Frank's book "Bush on the Couch". The man's right - Basically the Chimp is a Sociopath and you can see right where he got it from.

Babs is a cross between the Borgias and Elizabeth Bathory. Bathory bathed in the blood of virgins.

Babs is contentedly bathing in the blood of the 1,100+ young men and women who have already died for her psycho son's lies.

This family is Pure Evil and one day they're gonna have to answer for it. I hope he ends up before the Hague on War Crimes charges.

Posted by: Rockin in Afghanistan

Andrew Bolt ASIO agent?

I see this in the paper today...' ...longstanding ASIO agent and informant Denis Warner of the Melbourne Herald...'

Warner is retired and the Herald was folded into the Herald-Sun where Andrew Bolt now operate's today.

Bolt was reported to have been investigated by the AFP in relation to documents leaked about intelligence whistleblower, Andrew Wilkie. Bolt's counterparts in terms of leaking in the United States might be Novak and Jeff Guckert/Gannon.

Bob Carr/ Kim Beazley approved urban renewal

FALLEN SAINTS

On Tuesday, St Agnes Place, Kennington - the oldest squatted
street in London - was evicted by bailiffs and hundreds of riot
police. On Wednesday the area including the park was still
cordoned off, and it is believed demolition was taking place.
Supporters turned up, but there was very little they could do due
to the sheer scale of the police operation. A wake for the death
of St Agnes Street was held at Lambeth Town Hall in the afternoon.
The eviction took a full twelve hours with the last few remaining
residents brutally beaten by the cops, resulting in one losing
consciousness and being taken away by ambulance.

Police also evicted the Pirate TV bus, despite being unable to
find anything wrong with the paperwork or the bus, except that it
couldn't start. The cops instructed it be towed away but luckily
the boys from the recovery firm managed to get it going and save
it from the police compound.

Not content with evicting a whole street, police and bailiffs then
evicted a squat in nearby Bolton Crescent, despite the fact the
court case for the eviction was not due to be held till 16th
December, making the eviction illegal: nice to see the boys in
blue upholding the law.

There was predictably little mainstream coverage of the eviction,
and the journos around were "embedded" with the police, and only
shown what the police chose to show. The eviction marks the ends
of the thirty year old vibrant community and leaves 150 people
homeless with winter already here. It will instead be replaced by
a soulless estate and a sports centre. It is reckoned that "unpaid
rent" on the properties amounted to £4m over the years and that,
according to Lambeth Council, they were "paying nothing to the
community" - as if paying rent for your home to some landlord was
more important than actually being a thriving community not based
on capitalist exploitation. www.stagnesplace.net

Johhny Bega

A MEETING to determine the degree of concern felt within the community regarding the Government's proposed changes to the Anti-terrorism Bill will be held in the Bega Town Hall next Friday, December 9.

A meeting in Bermagui last weekend was well attended with people from as far afield as Batemans Bay and Pambula.

The meeting, convened by Laurel Lloyd-Jones, the executive director of the Elm Grove Sanctuary Trust, (a philanthropic foundation that works for human rights, social justice, the environment and the care of all people), was in response to anxiety expressed by many people regarding the changes and the effect that they may have on individual freedoms in this country.

The meeting was unanimous in the decision that a larger public meeting should be held as a matter of urgency to the public to be better informed regarding the consequences of the new bill.
The meeting will be held next Friday, December 9, at Bega Town Hall at 5.30pm.

Mrs Lloyd-Jones said she believed the proposed changes to the bill would change the texture of Australian society as we know it.

"My deep concern is that so many people are unaware of just how these new laws will impact upon their lives and their families," she said.

"No longer will evidence be required in order to imprison, detain and control a citizen, merely suspicion will be sufficient, and habeas corpus (the requirement to show cause) will be removed.

"Individuals will be required to 'dob-in' family, friends, or colleagues, and provide records about people.

"Such people will not be allowed to disclose this to their immediate family members or they will be liable to imprisonment for up to seven years therefore encouraging a public culture of secrecy and distrust.

"One can imagine the problems this would create in murder or criminal abduction cases as the new laws would make the local police, who will be told nothing, unlikely to act in the critical hours and days after such events as they could assume that such people were being detained under these new laws.

"Also, should one parent be informed, then they are unable to inform the other without being subject to imprisonment, and for example, should a detained person fail to appear at a Centrelink office then the family would lose their benefits.

"The Australian Federal Police are not required to reveal the reason for preventative detention of citizens and a person may be locked up for days or months without knowing why.

"A detained person will be allowed to contact one family member, or an employer to state 'I am safe but unable to be contacted'.

"Should that person disclose anything regarding this, they also may be imprisoned.

"No longer will an Australian citizen have the right to a lawyer of choice and all client-lawyer communication will be monitored.

"These laws will act to suppress public comment which is unfavourable to government policies or actions and under the proposed sedition laws anyone criticising the government will be subject to arrest.

"This applies to journalists, writers, cartoonists, comedy satirists and public speech or written comment by any Australian citizen."

Mrs Lloyd-Jones said that the Government's current track record and the complete rejection and ridicule of any opposing comments about Government policies by well qualified experienced and respected people within our community did not provide us with any confidence.

"The potential for future misuse and political manipulation and control of the Australian public and the media is a matter which should concern us all at this time," she said.

Burmese torture horror's

Prisoners reveal horror of torture in Burma - By Sebastien Berger in Mae Sot.
Torture techniques used by Burma's security services to terrorise the regime's opponents are revealed in unprecedented detail in a report released today.

Based on the testimony of 35 former political prisoners, it describes beatings, electric shocks, burning with lighters, water tortures and attempts to use dogs to rape male prisoners.

Aye Aye Moe with pictures of the regime's prisoners
Aye Aye Moe was arrested and beaten for visiting her brother

"I can forgive my torturers everything but the sexual abuse," said a victim of the last method. "No religion permits such an act. It has destroyed my self-esteem, my dignity."

Another man was told by his tormentors: "Moe Aye, think carefully and tell us the truth. If you don't, we will make you a homosexual."

The document is published as the UN Security Council prepares to debate Burma for the first time at the request of the US, which specifically cited the country's 1,100 political prisoners.

The most prominent prisoner is Aung San Suu Kyi, the National League for Democracy leader. This week, the Nobel peace prize winner had her house arrest extended for another six months.

The new report on torture was compiled by the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP), an exile group based in Mae Sot, just over the Thai border.

"The military regime seeks not only to break down the identity of former political prisoners, but also to make them walking advertisements for the consequences of speaking out against the regime," it says.

"Many former political prisoners repeatedly explain that once they are a political prisoner, they are always a political prisoner."

One stress position used to torture victims it describes is "the aeroplane", whereby prisoners balance on one foot holding out their arms and other leg.

Another is "the motorcycle", where they must balance on the balls of their feet, often with pins beneath their feet, while making engine noises.

A third, "the Semigwa dance", is based on a traditional Burmese performance but involves crawling over gravel on knees and elbows.

Women are not exempt and have been threatened with rape. One female prisoner quoted in the report said: "The officer slapped me a number of times and other officers punched me on the back.

"After that, he threatened that I shouldn't forget I was a virgin. This terrified me more than the beatings."

One of those interviewed for the report, Myo Myint, yesterday described his ordeal in an interview in Mae Sot.

As a Burmese soldier, he lost a foot, hand and most of his remaining fingers fighting Communist insurgents.

But his military record was no defence once he turned against the government.

"As soon as they arrested me they sent me to an interrogation centre," he said. "They punched and hit my face and chest, then they put me on the see-saw."

Tied to what would normally be a playground toy, he was laid head-down and beaten for hours, until his skull pounded with the pressure of blood.

"They showed me the people who had been beaten, all bloody. One of my colleagues was beaten to death."

Released in 1997, he was re-arrested within a month. "The second time was worse. At first they didn't say anything, they just tied me up, kicked and hit me. For 11 days I was not allowed to sleep.

"An iron bar was rolled along my shin until the skin ripped - it really hurt."

Threatened with a third arrest earlier this year and unable to face any more torture, he fled.

Aye Aye Moe, who was not involved in politics but arrested aged 23 after visiting her activist brother, was subjected to surreal questioning and kicked in the breasts and stomach.

"I asked them why I had been arrested," she said. "They asked me why I was there."

A Western diplomat in Rangoon said it was widely known that torture was used by the military regime but its extent was unclear.

While the report covers events dating back to 1988 and seeks to extend the definition of torture to include poor prison conditions and healthcare, Bo Kyi, joint secretary of the AAPP, pointed out that an NLD member was beaten to death earlier this year.

No one at Burma's ministry of information was available to comment yesterday.

Chinese Commie Torture technique's

BEIJING — Fu Minhai was questioned by police in Heilongjiang province nearly a decade ago along with several others on suspicion of theft, burglary and rape. After eleven days in custody and massive damage to his kidneys and related soft tissue, the 24-year-old was dead.

Alleged torture in Chinese police custody is not unusual. But in a rare legal victory for victims and their families, a court in September found two officers, Tan Xiaobo and Song Lintao, guilty of extracting a confession from Fu by force and sentenced them to seven years in prison.

"The family came under a lot of pressure for bringing this case," said Peng Bai, the Fus' attorney and a member of the Heilongjiang Far East Group law firm. "Ultimately, though, the fact could not be denied that he died because of police torture."

In another rare move, Beijing has allowed the United Nations' special rapporteur on torture, Manfred Nowak, to conduct an 11-day inspection tour of Chinese prisons, mental hospitals and other detention facilities.

The trip, which wraps up Friday, is the culmination of a decade-long U.N. effort to send a representative to China, an effort frustrated by repeated excuses. Nowak, an Austrian law professor, said earlier that he expected to have broad access to facilities and prisoners.

China outlawed torture in 1996, but activists and lawyers say the practice remains widespread. This has led some to question why the communist government would allow Nowak's potentially embarrassing visit to take place now.

Analysts say several factors appear to be at work.

"They've played hide-and-seek with the U.N. for over a decade," said Nicolas Becquelin, Hong Kong-based research director with Human Rights in China, a civic group. "The fact that the visit has gone ahead shows it has top support."

Allowing outside scrutiny is part of a broader effort to make the Chinese legal system more accountable and reputable. The hope is that the growing social frustration over land seizures, corruption and the economic gap between rich and poor can be swept off the streets and into the courts, where it is less threatening to Communist Party rule. Beijing reported 74,000 protests across the country last year, up from 58,000 in 2003.

Reformist elements in the police force, led by Minister of Public Security Zhou Yongkang, also are keen to see their ranks become more professional, analysts say. A series of embarrassing cases has undercut the force's reputation, the analysts add, whereas broader public support would help the police garner bigger budgets at a time when crime rates are rising and social pressures are becoming increasingly complex.

The visit also may have propaganda value. China has allowed the tour after one of its harshest human rights critics, the United States, imposed so many conditions ahead of a similar inspection of U.S. detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that Nowak refused to go. It also comes as the Bush administration is voicing opposition to a measure introduced by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) that would bar cruel or degrading treatment of prisoners in U.S. custody.

Beijing also has an interest in burnishing its international reputation at a time when critics have used its human rights record to justify a continued European ban on the sale of weapons to China. Domestically, the government is aware that its legitimacy increasingly depends on persuasion and the delivery of social services rather than force.

Although the visit and China's ratification of the U.N. Convention Against Torture represent a start, experts do not expect significant change on the ground anytime soon. China has a host of impressive laws and regulations that are not enforced, and local areas have a centuries-old tradition of resisting central control.

Human rights activists say torture is a crutch for police not accustomed to proving their cases. Local public security bureaus traditionally have dominated the criminal justice system, a situation summed up by a Chinese expression: "The police cook the rice, the prosecutor delivers the rice and the court eats the rice." Legal experts say local officials would resist careful review of their methods by a more vigilant judiciary.

Torture also is deeply entrenched under a system heavily reliant on confessions and rapid-fire justice to exert control. As far back as the 1930s, the Chinese Communist Party had initiated a "cleansing anti-revolutionaries" movement under which party members were arrested, beaten and fed chili peppers until they confessed and implicated others, according to a new biography of Mao Tse-tung.

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences legal scholar Chen Yunsheng outlined in a 2000 book various forms of torture used more recently. These included beatings with fists, boots and batons, sometimes involving cases of pregnant women losing their babies; false executions using unloaded guns; force-feeding of excrement; and "riding the motorcycle," in which victims are ordered to assume a crouching martial arts position that becomes extremely painful over a prolonged period.

The nine-year battle for justice by the Fu family, ending in the conviction of the two policemen, required the victim's parents to visit dozens of government offices and make repeated visits to Beijing from their home in the northeastern province of Heilongjiang. To make ends meet, they often slept under bridges on their trips.

According to the Shenghuo Bao newspaper, court documents and the family's lawyer, Fu Minhai was picked up by the police Jan. 26, 1996. The procurator's investigation found that the policemen, Tan and Song, beat Fu with a wooden baton, damaging his arms, legs, lower back and kidneys. A doctor surnamed Li who saw Fu shortly before his death told a local newspaper that the police refused to transfer the prisoner to the hospital.

Fu's older brother was allowed to visit him Feb. 6. The authorities reportedly told the brother that Fu was gravely ill and no longer able to urinate, but that he could be saved if they received a payoff.

"I can't take it anymore," Fu reportedly said to his brother. "Tan and Song beat me most ruthlessly."

After much pleading by the brother, Fu was transferred to a hospital, where he died that evening of his injuries. The hospital report cited acute kidney failure, soft-tissue damage and degeneration of the heart as the cause of death.

The family is now fighting for compensation and believes the seven-year sentences handed down by the Yichun People's Court were too light given the nature of the crime.

In a further twist, one of the two defendants has so far evaded the law. Seven months before the final decision was handed down, Tan escaped from a fourth-floor lavatory at the courthouse.

Those in favor of reform say cases such as this successful prosecution and the visit by the U.N. rapporteur are hopeful signs, but more needs to be done.

"There's a misperception that when police commit a crime, it's just a minor mistake," said Peng, the Fu family's attorney. "We need more protection for victims and independent third parties to keep the government clean.

"There are many torture cases in China, and many are discovered, but the judgment is often insufficient," he added. "The real challenge is to restructure the system and change old ways of thinking."

Post Platformism Please!

For Post-Left Anarchism and Green Anarchy

Post-left anarchism is the only essential hyphenated anarchism I can see the need for at the moment in the West. ( Even though I'm partial to the tag ' Pan-anarchist'. ) Post-left anarchism appears necessary in the Anglosphere imho especially because some anarchists are ignorant about their principles.
Let's be very clear about why we are not Leftists no matter how much DNA we share - for the same reason we are not Chimpanzee's...or slime mould.
The term 'Left' arose during the French Revolution. During one of the earliest representational political chambers those who sat on the right generally represented the ' Ancien regime' or reactionaries and conservatives. The forward looking, the progressive and the radical reformists sat on the Left.
Now as anarchists have consistantly opposed representational politics in favour of direct action and where meetings and decisions are required anarchists call for revocable, recallable rotatable delegates WITHOUT VOTING POWERS to report back to smaller constituent assemblies and individual's. This is far closer to direct democracy and consensus and is ( or should be ) the default anarchist ' political' position.
Clearly it is neither ' left' nor ' right' as it is NON REPRESENTATIONAL.
' No God - No Master '
The great Mahknovista movement of South Central Ukraine was not ' Left'.
Most of the Left back then was bourgeois and urban. ( Still is )
The great Spanish peoples revolution was not left from the July 1936 battle for Barcelona to November when a some of the most prominent anarchists felt the need to ally with the Left ( and the state ) Most anarchists continued to aquit themselves well in spite of the mistakes made by some ' leader's' , some of whom were bourgeois and urban.
The point needs to be made again and again that the task of liberating and emancipating the peasant's is the task for the peasant's themselves.
The Left has invariably been urban and bourgeois ( middle class ) from the start and so also been representational as far as the vast majority of the population is concerned.
A quick word on the terms ' Socialist' and ' Communist'. It has long been mantained that the term ' Anarcho-socialist' was a stupid redundancy - ALL anarchists being socialists ( Libertarian - socialists )
You might think the same logic applies to the redundancy that is ' Anarcho-communist' , however this is contested by some of the Neo-Marxists splitters, wreckers and entryists in the movement today.
Suffice to note for now that a great debate raged between the Wars about the differences between ' socialism' and ' communism'. In the end it was agreed that there were NO substantative differences worth spit.

Following WW2 it was noted that ANY class could be revolutionary in its time and place...and also that trad anarcho-syndicalism had it's work cut out for it in a booming Anglo and Eurosphere.
Post-left anarchism was given it's modern boost by the bankrupt and banal activities of ' Municipalists' in the seventies and eighties who wanted to run for local elections and ' Workerists' who wanted to revive anarcho-syndicalism ( using a violent electric storm presumably ).
These dead end's and cul-de-sac's were clearly not progressing anarchist theory and praxis in the Anglosphere.
Post-left anarchism did because it worked in with Green anarchy, then taking off from the fag end of the Hippie era.
Green anarchy brings insights from biology, anthropology, Sociology, molecular physic's, ecology, ergonomics, indigenous studies, appropriate technology studies and many other varied specialized fields all networked and interacting and all given massive impetus by, first PUNK ROCK; DYI PUNK and then much later the by the first internet.
Post-left anarchism that is based on science is no easy strawman for leftists to push over. Post-left anarchism is revolutionary not just against the god and the state but also the entire rationale for clapped out and staggering bankrupt, stale and flat Leftism.
The biggest most sustained leftist challenge to post-left anarchism is a sour resentful and throuroughly Leninist sort of neo-marxism called ' Anarchist-communism' also known as ' Platformism'. It's critiques buy into the right wing strawman image of ' Primitivism' and also attack revolutionary anarchism in other ways. By pouring scorn on all the great Propaganda of the deed anarchists for example. These dogmatic, leftist, workerist purists owe more than a little to the Trotskyist roots many of them share.
The original Leninists were pretty good at entryism too!
Still anarchism has survived the worst red-fascist Leninism and brown-fascist Hitlerism could throw at it. A few ' dead-enders' won't hold us back now. Post-left anarchists are pragmatist's and practical and inventive in the finest inventive Yankee, Aussi, Irish sense.
They want to know what will work to take out god and the state tomorrow. And not just make that ' work' in their revolution of everyday life but also they want to play without retraint and live without dead time.
Now we have the Freenet's and Wildnet's the sky's the limit for an unhyphented inclusive BIG BROTHEL, sorry, BIG TENT anarchism that can, not only regain the great peak's we achieved in 1936 but go on to scale even greater heights. The world anarchist revolution eluded us then but thats no matter...tomorrow we'll run faster...stretch out our arms farther.

Enough rope

We're giving them enough rope - Sian Powell, Jakarta correspondent December 03, 2005

NGUYEN Tuong Van's execution in Singapore yesterday morning will shine a revealing light on capital punishment in Asia and on Australia's failure to condemn all death sentences in all cases.

In the months leading to his execution, attention focused on Australia's diplomatic and judicial efforts to prevent Australians following in Van's tragic footsteps. Twelve Australians are on trial across the world on charges that carry the death penalty. A further two have already been convicted and await their fate.

Yet the effort to block this terrible march to execution has been hampered, activists say, by the Australian Government's tacit approval of the death sentence for the Bali bombers and those convicted of bombing the Australian embassy in Jakarta.

Although the Australian Government recently won reprieves for two Australians sentenced to death in Vietnam, its position on the Bali bombers will have far more resonance in Indonesia, where nine Australians are on trial for heroin smuggling, a crime that carries the death penalty.

Legal experts note, too, that there is room to improve the fate of those who will be arrested in the future. Agreements on consular access could be overhauled to ensure embassies are immediately told of the arrests of all Australians. And Australia could recommend expert lawyers rather than simply providing a list.

Singapore has perhaps the world's highest rate of executions per capita. Serious drug convictions carry mandatory sentences, giving judges no latitude for leniency. Clemency is rare. Death sentences have been commuted to life in prison perhaps six times since Singapore's independence, activists say. Eleventh-hour pleas for Van's life left the Singapore Government unmoved.

Amnesty International's Tim Goodwin says Singaporeans may doubt the strength of Australia's opposition. The Straits Times, a newspaper known to publish the Government's line, has questioned Australia's abhorrence of the death penalty, Goodwin says, noting it seems to apply only to Australians on death row, not to those of other races, such as the Bali bombers.

"Our concern is with the Government's approach. There must be universal and principled opposition to the death penalty," Goodwin says.

The death sentences for Bali bombers Mukhlas, Amrozi and Imam Samudra won tacit approval in Australia, from the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister among others.

"It's not, of course, the policy of the Australian Government to support the death penalty, but in these particular circumstances we won't be making any representations against the sentence," Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said following Samudra's death sentence in 2003.

These sentiments were echoed after the sentences of Ahmad Hasan and Rois over the Australian embassy bombing in Jakarta last year. "Whatever we may think about the death penalty, the fact that these people have been convicted is a very good thing," Downer said when Hasan was sentenced to death this year.

While the stance probably played well in ordinary Australian living rooms, it may prove a hindrance in the battle to win clemency for the Australians now on death row.

Indonesians have long memories for Australian hypocrisy and most Australian politicians know how sensitive Indonesian opinion can be; John Howard warned drugs convict Michelle Leslie to keep her Bali story to herself in case she influenced the trials of other Australians in Indonesia. Eight Australian men and one Australian woman - the so-called Bali nine - will almost certainly be convicted for heroin smuggling and perhaps sentenced to death.

Indonesia has been very tough on drug crimes recently. Two Thais and an Indian were executed for drug crimes last year in Indonesia, and there is a growing clamour for ever-tougher punishments. Agitators picketed drug smuggler Schapelle Corby's trial in Bali, demanding her execution. If the nine Australians are spared, there will be an outcry in Indonesia, and there is little doubt Australian reaction to the Bali bombers' death sentence will be revisited.

Kevin O'Rourke, from the NSW Council for Civil Liberties, says it's likely Australian politicians will regret their failure to condemn the Bali bombers' death sentences.

"Those comments, particularly, were unfortunate to say the least," he says. "Anything that looks as though Australia is giving tacit support to the death penalty should be avoided."

The death penalty is in retreat across the world but has remained a force in Asia. In Thailand, the death-row population has tripled during the past two to three years. In Indonesia, the Government has resumed executions after a years-long hiatus and the numbers on death row keep growing.

While it may be tempting for politicians to make an exception for terrorists, it should be remembered that 30-year-old Sydneysider Tallaal Adrey is on trial on terrorism charges in Kuwait. If convicted, he is likely to be sentenced to death. Adelaide man David Hicks has been languishing for years without trial in Guantanamo Bay, accused of terrorism. His fate is unclear. Yet another Australian is on trial for murder in Lebanon and could also face execution.

Most Australians facing the death penalty, though, have been charged over drug crimes. Two Australians are on death row for drug crimes in Vietnam, 46-year-old Melbourne man Mai Cong Thanh and 45-year-old Sydney permanent resident Nguyen Van Chinh. Sydneysider Trinh Huu, 56, is on trial in Ho Chi Minh City on drug charges that carry the death penalty.

Addressing slowly mounting Australian anger over Van, Downer has repeatedly said how hard the Australian Government worked to persuade the Singaporeans to grant the young man clemency.

Goodwin agrees the Government made repeated representations to Singapore, especially after public and media pressure began to mount.

However, some activists remain unsure if sufficient pressure was applied early enough and expert lawyers retained in time, which could be a key point, especially with Singapore's mandatory sentencing.

A spokesman for the Foreign Minister says Australia set to work for Van from the start: "Our work began more than two years ago when he was first arrested, when we made representations to the Singaporeans to have him charged with a lesser charge that didn't carry the death penalty. Our representations have continued at the highest level ever since."

However, O'Rourke, among others, has experience of at least one case in which consular representatives weren't immediately told of an Australian's arrest and counsel wasn't appointed until after the accused had signed a statement, perhaps as long as 24 hours after his arrest. Gordon Vuong, then 16, arrested with narcotics in Cambodia, was convicted this year and sentenced to 13 years' jail.

Rod Smith, of the Department of Foreign Affairs' consular division, says an international convention requires all signatory nations to inform consular authorities "without delay" of arrests. "In the Cambodian case you refer to, the embassy was advised of the person's arrest and granted access within 18 hours, and a consular officer was present while he was interviewed by police," Smith says.

O'Rourke believes justice would be better served if the Australian Government developed multilateral protocols that included time frames for the notification of consular officers (for instance, within an hour of arrest), and regulations that all interrogations must wait until a lawyer is present.

He also believes that consular officers should be able to advise on which lawyers should be retained. At the moment all they can do is offer a list of English-speaking lawyers, they cannot advise which are the best.

"It's a bit like handing over the Yellow Pages and saying: 'How about one of these?"' O'Rourke says. "They can't say who is bad, who is good, who will be able to help you."

Kay Danes, who spent 10 months in a Laotian prison on charges that were later dropped and who now works with the Foreign Prisoner Support Service, worries that Van's execution will signal worse to come.

"I'm worried about what happens, and what message that sends to Indonesia," she says. "In my own case, the Australian Government certainly bent over backwards. We [Danes and her husband, Kerry] got tremendous support, but I'm starting to think it depends on what you're detained for. Some aren't getting the same treatment.

"I just wish our Government would have a bit of backbone, negotiate a bit harder. The US went in and cleaned their people out of Thai jails.

"The Brits got theirs out of Guantanamo Bay. What are we? The deputy bloody sheriff?"

Filthy corrupt police lie all the time

SUEZANNE Hayman served 3 1/2 years' jail on a drug-smuggling confession that a corrupt police officer later told the Wood royal commission was "straight fiction".

The New Zealand-born woman was raising three teenage children in Sydney at the time of her arrest in 1986, but in 1992 - a year after completing much of her sentence in maximum security - the punishment continued. She was deported over the conviction of conspiracy to import heroin.

Seven years since the sham conviction was quashed and 13 years since being forced to separate from her children and grandchildren and return to New Zealand, Ms Hayman, 56, was told this week she was no longer blackbanned from returning to Australia.

"It's just been horrendous, from the first step that (policeman) took," Ms Hayman said on the phone from her home at Kerikeri in the Bay of Islands in New Zealand.

When an Immigration Department official called on Tuesday night to give her the news, it was the final victory in a battle that separated her from her children when she was sent to Mulawa women's prison in western Sydney in 1988.

She lived for a year in Sydney after her release and met her future husband, Chris Hayman, but was deported on a 24-hour passport. "It was done very quickly and very maliciously, in front of my family and in front of my children. It came as an absolute shock," she said.

In 1995, Detective Sergeant Paul William Deaves admitted that the unsigned confession in which she had admitted to importing heroin from Thailand was a fabrication.

After the conviction was quashed in 1998, she sued the NSW and federal police over wrongful imprisonment and malicious prosecution. All she would say of the confidential settlement was that she was happy.

Ms Hayman's three children and their families have all moved to live within an hour of her Kerikeri property and she has no plans to settle back in Australia, but she can now return for her stepson's wedding after Christmas.

"Everything's fine now, everything's great. It's like a chain being taken off my neck," she said.

Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone apologised for the delay in lifting the ban.

Deaves told the Wood royal commission that police had "made our mind up" to charge her, and that the confession was "straight fiction". In exchange for his admissions, Deaves was granted immunity from prosecution.

Police telling Porkies

To grab more power...UK case for holding terror suspects 'misleading'

The UK government's stated case for holding terror suspects longer than 14 days without charge is misleading, according to a top computer security specialist.

When home secretary Charles Clarke was trying to persuade the House of Commons to extend the detention period to 90 days, he argued that this was needed to break into encrypted files on suspects' computers. MPs voted against the government's planned increase, but backed a compromise 28-day limit.

But Ross Anderson, professor of security engineering at the University of Cambridge, says that breaking into highly encrypted material is no longer possible. "You find the key lying around, or you give up."

Police investigators might usefully "spend a couple of days tossing a dictionary at the encryption software", he says. This could provide access to a file containing the encryption key itself, but only if the suspect had been careless enough to choose an easily guessed password to protect it.

Investigators might then spend a few more days trawling through the hard disc for passwords and clues, he adds. They would hunt, for example, for copies of the key left behind in the "swap file" that many computers use when they run out of memory. But all this could be done within the existing 14-day limit.

Liberal Democrat peer Lord Thomas of Gresford has told New Scientist that he will raise the issue when the bill is discussed in parliamentary committee next week.

Bush to invade Antigua?

Antigua to develop Internet gambling - THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

ST. JOHN'S, Antigua -- Antigua will continue developing its Internet gambling industry despite pressure from the United States to prohibit the practice, the finance minister said Wednesday.
Finance Minister Errol Cort said at least 10 new online gambling companies will open on the Caribbean island next year, joining 14 that already have been granted operating licenses.
Cort said the new companies will generate some 500 new jobs and more than $2 million in gambling licenses fees.
The United States contends that Internet gambling should be prohibited because it violates some state laws. Antigua says the U.S. position is contrary to global trade rules.
Antigua's has taken the dispute to the World Trade Organization, which has yet to rule on the matter.
Addressing Parliament during his annual budget presentation, Cort said the government will tightly regulate Internet gambling to meet "the most stringent international ... practices."

Orally men

Bill O'Reilly's with us!...'...against the "hateful liars" who "spit out" "blatant propaganda" that is "picked up by the mainstream media, and rammed down the public's throat."

But the bromide-heavy speech that President George W. Bush gave yesterday at the Naval Academy presents a clear strategy for quagmire and eventual disaster. Despite the gathering storm of opposition to his approach to the war in Iraq, the speech was bereft of new ideas, calling to mind the words of Emerson: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."

"My whole life I've lived above board," Corrupt crony capitalist Cunningham pleaded. "I've never even smoked a marijuana cigarette."

The Duke may not have treated his lungs with ganja, but he did attend one of the most infamous orgies in Pentagon history, the 1991 Tailhook Symposium in Las Vegas, the annual gathering of Navy flyers, Pentagon bigwigs, congressional kingpins and defense contractors. Over the course of that September weekend at the Vegas Hilton, at least 83 women were stripped, forced to run a gauntlet of drunken, groping pilots, and sexually molested, with some being forced to "ride the butt rodeo", a Tailhook euphemism for having a pilot bite your buttocks until you can shake yourself free.

KKK street

Abramoff, lobbyists linked to troubled multibillion-dollar Homeland Security contract
John Byrne
It was supposed to be “the deal of the century.”

The Transportation Security Administration awarded a $1 billion contract to Unisys to devise a cutting-edge computer network linking hundreds of airports to the TSA’s state-of-the-art security centers. The contract was ideal, they argued, because if the company failed to meet its goals, Unisys would pay money back to the agency.

It didn’t turn out that way. In October, the Washington Post revealed the Pennsylvania-based information services company had overcharged the government for a whopping 117,000 hours -- billing $131 an hour for employees who were paid less than half that amount. Officials now see the project costing taxpayers as much as $3 billion.
Unisys’ prime lobbyists? A team from the Greenberg Traurig lawfirm led by Neil Volz, former chief of staff to Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) -- which included indicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

RAW STORY has found that Unisys acquired the contract, said riddled with fraud, in a process that included backroom dealings and almost no competitive bidding, and former Abramoff associates say his lobbyists had a hand in the deal. The investigation also found that the man who brokered the TSA deal, a company president, was later a buyer of Abramoff’s posh Washington restaurant.

According to campaign finance filings, Volz’s team included seven staffers – among them individuals now under scrutiny in various probes, including Abramoff. Two Senate committees are currently investigating Abramoff, an erstwhile conservative superlobbyist who was indicted in Florida for conspiracy and wire fraud.

Details of Volz’s role are vague. Washington Business Forward reported that the firm listed Unisys as a client in October 2002. The TSA contract was awarded in August of that year.

Unisys, however, did not register Greenberg Traurig as a lobbyist until January of 2003, six months after the TSA contract. Corporations are not required to register if they are lobbying executive branch agencies below the level of political appointees.

Associates say Abramoff firm lobbied for contract

According to former associates, Volz and his team were charged with acquisition of government contracts and not with legislative work. One associate confirmed that Greenberg lobbyists had helped Unisys acquire the TSA contract but asserted that there had not seemed to be anything 'suspicious' about Abramoff's work. Another denied Abramoff had a role but was less confident about the role of Greenberg's other lobbyists.

Greenberg Traurig declined to comment.

Unisys paid Greenberg Traurig $596,000 in 2003 and 2004; Greenberg is the highest-paid lobbying firm the company has retained since 1998. A spokesman for Abramoff declined to comment.

Unisys spokesman Guy Esnouf told RAW STORY the firm had decided not to disclose the dates they retained Abramoff’s firm or any information regarding their interaction.

“I wouldn’t be able to comment at all,” Esnouf said.

This September, Unisys publicly lauded Greenberg for their lobbying work – an anomaly in the post- Abramoff climate. According to Influence Magazine, the firm remains a “satisfied customer.”

The lead broker of Unisys' TSA bid, now-president of Unisys' public sector division Greg Baroni, bought a share of bought Abramoff’s Pennsylvania Avenue restaurant, Signatures, when the lobbyist sold it in July of this year. He was promoted to corporate vice president by the company’s board in 2004.

A sweetheart deal

A report at the time stated some of the TSA’s decision making in awarding the contract involved “backroom negotiations.” The deal was not awarded using traditional competitive bidding.

Instead, the project was awarded from a pool of pre-qualified corporate “partners” selected under Information Technology Omnibus Procurement II, a government-wide General Services Administration acquisition contract. Only fourteen companies were qualified for the work under the terms of the task order.

As Information Technology partners, Unisys and Electronic Data Systems Corp. were the only firms to compete. According to an article in GovExec.com, a government watchdog, “insiders said Unisys had the inside track.”

Unisys was awarded the contract in August 2002. Celebrations were muted, however, since TSA was mired in a budget dispute. Two weeks earlier, the Office of Management and Budget had frozen funding for various technology projects. So a week later, according to GovExec, officials from “TSA and the White House met on a Sunday night in Baroni's office.” Within 48 hours, administration officials had given the green light to unfreeze TSA's budget.

At the time, the chief of staff to the General Services Administration was David Safavian, a former Abramoff colleague and later chief of federal procurement who was arrested in September for obstructing an investigation into the Abramoff's attempts to buy government property.

Safavian’s attorney, Barbara Van Gelder, said her client had no interaction with Unisys and was not in a position to unfreeze TSA's budget.

Lobbying reports compiled by the Center for Public Integrity show Unisys paid Greenberg $480,000 in 2003 and $116,000 in 2004.

A troubled history

Unisys has a history of legal trouble with regard to federal contracts. In 1991, Unisys pled guilty in U.S. District Court to using fraud, bribery and illegal campaign contributions to obtain billions of dollars in defense contracts. An investigation the Justice Department started in 1986 known as Operation Ill Wind resulted in the prosecution of seven companies, nine government officials and 42 individuals; Unisys' fines and penalties totaled up to $190 million.

Nine Unisys employees were indicted and pled guilty to using fraudulent practices to obtain government contracts. The company and its predecessor, mainframe computer manufacturer Sperry Corp., billed the government $17 million in consulting fees, diverted money to offshore accounts, and used the money to bribe Pentagon officials.

The product of a 1986 merger between Sperry Corporation and Burroughs, Unisys maintains offices in nearly every U.S. state and more than 60 countries. They say they're happy with Greenberg's work, now that the lobby shop has dismissed Abramoff from their stables.

"As long as they terminated the relationship [with Abramoff], that was my principal concern," Unisys vice president of government relations David Pingree told Influence Magazine.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, the Fortune 500 company has accrued some $10.7 billion in federal contracts since 1990, and has worked with the CIA, the EPA and the Navy among myriad other government agencies.

Jason Leopold contributed reporting for this article. RAW Story.

Brutal and Backward Amerikkka

Incident at Oglala, 30 Years Later - The Long Struggle of Leonard Peltier

By JOE ALLEN and PAUL D'AMATO

Leonard Peltier, one of America's longest-serving political prisoners, turned sixty-one-years-old on September 12, 2005. Peltier has spent nearly thirty years in federal prison, the result of one of the most infamous political frame-ups in modern U.S. history. He was convicted of killing two agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on the Lakota Sioux Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota in 1975. Believing he could not receive a fair trial in the U.S., he fled to Canada. The Canadian government extradited him in 1976, and he was tried, convicted, and sentenced to two life terms in 1977.

Many of today's progressive-minded people will find themselves unfamiliar with the details as well as the significance of the Peltier case. This is a tragedy, given the widespread opposition to the Patriot Act and the heightened fear of political repression by opponents of the Bush administration. The rush of events since 9/11, instead of bringing the Peltier case back into focus, seems to have pushed it further into the margins of political consciousness, where it has unfortunately been for two decades. This is something that needs to be corrected.

Leonard Peltier, a citizen of the Lakota and Anishinabe nations, was an active member of the American Indian Movement (AIM) in the early 1970s in the upper Midwest, where he was born, and on the West Coast, where he lived and worked off-and-on for several years. AIM was a product of the militant struggles of the 1960s against racism and the Vietnam War (many of its members were Vietnam Veterans). Its most important leaders during the seventies-Dennis Banks and Russell Means-were inspired by the civil rights movement and, more importantly, the Black Panthers. Formed in 1968 by Anishinabe Indian activists in Minneapolis, AIM quickly sprouted chapters across the country, and moved from civil rights to issues of Indian sovereignty and pride.

Two events put AIM on the map. In 1972, on the eve of Richard Nixon's landslide reelection to the presidency, AIM led a nationwide caravan, called the "Trail of Broken Treaties," that culminated in the occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) headquarters in Washington, D.C. The BIA had long been a source of hatred for its flagrant embezzlement of funds that were supposed to go to impoverished Native Americans and for its legalizing of the theft of reservation land.

The following year, at the request of its residents, AIM led the armed occupation of Wounded Knee on the Pine Ridge reservation, the site of the historic massacre of Sioux men, women, and children in 1890. The event marked the coming together of urban Indian radicals with reservation traditionals who resented the corruption and abuse of the BIA-sponsored tribal administration, as well as its denigration of native traditions. During the ensuing seventy-one-day standoff, BIA police, FBI, and U.S. military fired 500,000 rounds of ammunition at the entrenched Indian encampment, killing two AIM members. While the siege provided little in tangible concessions from the federal government, it succeeded in publicizing AIM and generated a surge of popular interest in Native American issues and history. It also resulted in AIM becoming a greater target of ferocious government repression.

The FBI led the attack on AIM as part of its Counter Intelligence Program (COINTEPRO), begun in the mid-1960s under its director J. Edgar Hoover, and used with terrifying effectiveness against the Black Panther Party. COINTELPRO employed many dirty tricks against its targets including wiretapping, assassination, and the use of agents provocateurs-all in coordination with state and local police forces. The goal, according to FBI documents, was to "neutralize" the leadership. AIM members across the country faced constant harassment and frame-ups that drained the organization's resources and, eventually, broke its leadership. One of the AIM members caught up in this dragnet was Leonard Peltier.

During Wounded Knee II, Pine Ridge Tribal Chair Dickie Wilson formed the Guardians of the Oglala Nation (literally and boastfully GOON), paid for with a $62,000 BIA stipend, and launched a reign of terror on AIM and its supporters at Pine Ridge. Not by coincidence, at this time the BIA was interested in using Wilson to sign over a portion of the reservation known to be rich in uranium and molybdenum to the U.S. Forest Service. >From 1973 to 1976, more than sixty AIM members and supporters, many of them traditionals, were murdered without a finger lifted by the state government or the FBI to investigate their deaths. A new generation of rabidly racist and self-proclaimed "Indian fighters" emerged in South Dakota led by William Janklow, who declared: "The only way to deal with the Indian problem in South Dakota is to put a gun to the AIM leaders' heads and pull the trigger." He would eventually become South Dakota's attorney general, governor, and, later, the state's only congressman. (Last year, Janklow finally stepped down from his House seat after he was convicted and sentenced to 100 days in jail for slamming his speeding car into, and killing, a motorcyclist. In addition to his history of racism, Janklow apparently has a long history of reckless driving-thirteen traffic citations since 1990-and the judge in the case could have given Janklow ten years. But witnesses convinced him of Janklow's good character and solid contributions to the community.)

In the desperate and highly charged atmosphere of repression after Wounded Knee II, the traditional leaders on Pine Ridge appealed to AIM for help to defend themselves. Leonard Peltier was among the dozens of AIM members and supporters who went to Pine Ridge. AIM also provided support such as cutting firewood, collecting water, and preparing meals for the many elderly residents who lived in the most remote parts of the reservation. They provided protection from attacks by Wilson's GOONs, which usually took place late at night, making late evening hours a nightmare of gunfire and screams for help. AIM activists, including Peltier, were armed for their own protection as well as that of the residents.

What has now gone down in history as "the incident at Oglala" occurred on June 26, 1975, when two unmarked cars chased a red truck onto the Jumping Bull compound near the village of Oglala. Without identifying themselves, the FBI agents in pursuit of the red pick-up began shooting at it. The FBI later claimed that the agents were in pursuit of an Indian named Jimmy Eagle, for allegedly stealing cowboy boots. When the agents then began firing on the ranch, Peltier and others, who were defending the compound against GOON violence, fired back, not knowing who the men were or what they wanted. Within minutes, more than 150 FBI SWAT team members, Bureau of Indian Affairs police, and GOONs had surrounded the ranch. The quick response has led many to believe that the "incident" was a deliberate provocation by the FBI.

Peltier and others escaped the encirclement. When the FBI occupied the ranch they found AIM member Joe Killsright Stuntz and two FBI agents, Jack Koler and Ron Williams, shot dead at close range. No one has ever been convicted for killing Stuntz.

The largest manhunt in FBI history ensued, eventually resulting in the arrest of three AIM members, Dino Butler, Robert Robideau, and Leonard Peltier, for the murders of Koler and Williams. None of the defendants ever denied being at the Jumping Bull ranch that day or firing in self-defense, but all denied killing the FBI agents. Butler and Robideau were the first arrested and charged, and the first sent to trial while Peltier fought extradition in Canada. Robideau and Butler were tried in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, at the request of the U.S. Department of Justice, who believed that the white working class and lower middle class residents of this small provincial city would easily convict them. On July 16, 1976, to the shock of the government attorneys, the jury found Butler and Robideau not guilty of murder, accepting the argument for self-defense put forward by their famed radical attorney, William Kunstler.

In their humiliation, the FBI was determined to convict Peltier, who was captured by the Mounties on February 6, 1976. To obtain Peltier's extradition, the U.S. government presented to the federal Canadian court affidavits signed by Myrtle Poor Bear, who claimed to be Peltier's lover and to have witnessed Peltier shoot the FBI agents. Though it was later revealed that Poor Bear's testimony was coerced out of her by the FBI, the Canadian court turned Peltier over to the United States.

In March 1977, Peltier went to trial before an all-white jury in North Dakota and a hostile Judge Paul Benson, who refused to allow use of the self-defense argument and ruled repeatedly in favor of the government. The judge and prosecution suppressed all evidence favorable to Peltier.

Even though the lead prosecutor, the aptly named Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynn Crooks, failed to produce a single witness who could identify Peltier as the gunman who killed the agents, the jury found Peltier guilty and he was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. In the nearly thirty years since Peltier's false conviction, the case against him has continued to unravel. For example, a successful Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in the early 1980s turned up a concealed ballistics report showing that the gun Peltier allegedly used during the incident could not be matched with the bullet casing found near the agents. In 1985, when the Eighth Circuit Court held oral arguments on a motion filed by Peltier for a new trial, Lynn Crooks admitted, "we can't prove who shot those agents." Though the court found that the jury in Peltier's trial might have acquitted him had the FBI not withheld this evidence, they refused to grant him a new trial.

In 2000, when President Clinton announced that he was considering clemency for Peltier, he began making plans for his release. His friends even began planning to build him a new house. But after the FBI mobilized a campaign that included a march of 500 agents in front of the White House, Clinton backed down. Peltier's appeals have been denied more than ten times, and he remains in prison. But his spirit is not broken. Not long after Clinton's betrayal, he wrote:

Since that dark Saturday, I have managed to get up and dust myself off, and begin to lift my spirits once more. I am just as determined now to fight for my freedom as I was on February 6, 1976 when I was first arrested. I will not give up. This is the second time in the span of my incarceration that I made it to the top of the hill and saw that freedom was in view, only to be kicked right back down to the bottom again.

Peltier's experience in prison has been one of constant harassment and hardship. A Leonard Peltier Defense Committee statement aptly noted that,

Over the last year, Leonard has suffered the passing of several relatives and been denied many basic human rights. He has been placed in solitary confinement for no reason, denied phone privileges, religious rights, and visitation privileges, and was even unable to write letters to family and friends. Peltier's health has deteriorated in the last year and he has repeatedly been denied adequate medicine. Without reason, Leonard has been moved to several prisons with no concern for his health.

On June 30, Peltier was moved, without notice to his family or his attorneys, to the federal prison at Terre Haute, Indiana, from the federal prison at Leavenworth, Kansas. And on August 15-despite ailing health-he was moved to the federal prison at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. In 2008, Leonard Peltier comes up for parole, but the FBI and other forces will resist his release tooth and nail. If we are going to get any measure of justice for Leonard Peltier, we will have to be out in front of the White House when the time comes.

To find out more about Leonard Peltiers case, go to www.freepeltier.org/. The best books to read on Leonard Peltier's case are Peter Matthiessens In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, and The Trial of Leonard Peltier by Jim Messerschmidt. Peltiers own book, Prison Writings: My Life is My Sun Dance, is also excellent.

Joe Allen is a member of Teamsters Local 705 in Chicago. Paul D'Amato is associate editor of the ISR. - They can be reached @counterpunch

Hillary gets her war on

Women hold up half the lie ... Beautiful. I am in receipt today of a mailing from the Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign. This is different from the letter she sent out by e-mail in a rush. I don't know who got the e-mail. She announces it is 1,600 words long. That much of her sentences could end reading. The letter I got is more than a dead dry political mailing. I found it such compelling reading that I drop everything and share with you promptly and thus prominently.

It is a four-page questionnaire with the headline, "2005 Critical National Issues Survey." I thought that this was about the more than 2,000 dead in Iraq. Not even close. I read on, thinking that the pamphlet might tell me what Hillary stands for, as she is pretty much a blank thus far.

The questionnaire begins with a statement that we can't let Republican political attacks distract Hillary from her efforts in the Senate to address the critical issues our nation needs to address. Then there is the normal space for contributions by check or credit card. The amounts are from $25 to $100 and "other." Fine so far.

Here are the critical issues:
"Economy/jobs. Environment. Social Security/Medicare. Education. Homeland Security. Health Care. Tax Cuts. Reproductive Rights. Separation of Church and State."

Absolutely marvelous. Nothing about Iraq. Or the life and death of young Americans in Iraq. Or troop withdrawals from Iraq.

I go through the rest of the pamphlet.

"How concerned are you that President Bush is not doing enough to get Americans back to work, create more jobs and get the economy moving again?

"How concerned are you that the massive budget deficits caused by Republican economic and tax policies will inevitably result in drastic cuts in Social Security, Medicare, education and social services?"

Absolutely beautiful!

There are, as stated earlier, now more than 2,000 young Americans who have died in Iraq. She wants to be a candidate for president and she doesn't even mention our dead, or our next dead.

Wait. Here is question 9:

"How concerned are you that the administration's unilateral policies have reduced our number of allies and endangered our national security?"

How absolutely marvelous!

"It depends on what your definition of 'is' is," her husband said when he was questioned about rolling around on the office carpet with a young office worker.

And she not only copies, but clearly surpasses. She deals with something important.

Hillary Clinton today holds the new North American record for fakery.

She copies. She sneaks and slithers past you with her opinion on a war that kills every day.

Hillary Clinton is in favor of the war and of executions. Sensational!

The other day, when Rep. John Murtha of Johnstown, Pa., called for a withdrawal from Iraq, and obviously did so with half the Pentagon behind him, Hillary said, no, we shouldn't pull out at this time. Oh, it would cause so much violence.

We must stay. It takes a national Alzheimer's for her to be able to try to get away with things like this.

If Hillary Clinton wants this war to go on, then she should send her daughter to fight in Iraq.

We have had in New York as United States senators, Robert F. Kennedy, Jacob Javits and Daniel Moynihan.

We now have Hillary Clinton blowing on her fingers as she goes about cracking the combination to another safe. If the one hand glistens, it is from the wedding ring that she has used to hypnotize the public so far. Beautiful. FROM ' Where's Hillary on Iraq? ' Jimmy Breslin.

World exclusive for the RAT Foundation

World Exclusive* Nov 30 2005--Venice,FL. by Daniel Hopsicker

http://www.madcowprod.com/11302005.html

The MadCowMorningNews has learned that California Republican Congressman Randy ‘Duke’ Cunningham steered $500 million in defense contracts in less than a decade, according to the company’s own website, to a start-up San Diego software firm which—and here’s the beauty part—doubled as a lobbying firm.

The lobbying firm then gratefully kicked back —at a bare minimum— hundreds of thousands of dollars annually to a Jack Abramoff-directed Washington D.C. lobbying and consulting firm run by two former senior staffers of Texas Republican Tom DeLay.

It offered, in other words, one-stop shopping.

While the focus was on the $2 million in bribes paid to Cunningham after his guilty plea, the question of just what the Congressman had done for all that long green received scant media attention.

The GOPMOB's Magic Horn of Plenty.

But as the extent of the damage to America’s national security wrought by the bribes which crossed Cunningham’s greasy palm begins to come into focus, the fraud being revealed is orders of magnitude greater than has been hinted at so far.

Here’s how it worked:

Money budgeted for U.S. Defense went in at the ADCS end of something called the “Wilkes Corporation” for services which the Pentagon protested it never requested, and out the other end came a magical cornucopia of bribes, kick-backs, campaign contributions, yachts, Lear jets and Rolls Royce’s.

Over the course of almost an entire decade, from 1994 to 2001, Cunningham’s Appropriations Committee repeatedly added funding to the Pentagon budget for a previously non-existent (prior to 1995) software company, ADCS, owned by the “Wilkes Corporation,” a private company (natch) owned by San Diego businessman Brent Wilkes.
The money then made a short trip—courtesy the wonders of modern accounting—from one of Brent Wilkes’ pants pocket to another, called “Group W Advisors,” which proceeded to obligingly send hundreds of thousands of dollars in ‘client fees’ annually to The Alexander Strategy Group, a lobbying and consulting firm currently under scrutiny in the Justice Department's investigation of Casino Jack Abramoff.

"A little trouble keeping the company names straight, is all."
Wilkes himself even seems to have had trouble distinguishing between his various legal fictions...

Newspaper reports state his deal grew out of requests from the House National Security Committee, of which Cunningham was then a member, for the military to add an automated-document program to its budget.

His firm ADCS, according to Government Computer News, began by selling $5 million in document conversion software to the Pentagon. But the website of his lobbying firm, Group W Advisors, claims it is the entity "instrumental in introducing (digital document) technology to the Department of Defense,” as well as that the company's document-automation work, which began as a small “congressionally-mandated pilot project," has since generated more than $500 million in appropriations.

If you're wondering which company deserves the "credit," you may be missing the point.

Picture the memorable scene in the movie “Chinatown” where Fay Dunaway explains to Jack Nicholson what may have been a similarly-complicated state of affairs...

“She’s my sister! (Slap.) She’s my daughter! (Slap.) She’s my sister AND my daughter!”

See, the pea is under one of the shells; it doesn't really matter which.

In its blatant disregard for anything resembling reality, the scheme resembles nothing so much as the blatantly phony Abramoff-sponsored Institutes, Foundations, and political “think tanks” (whose ‘scholars in residence” turn out to be lifeguards and yoga instructors) which were exposed in recent Senate Hearings as vehicles used to move money through the bank accounts of a network of DeLay cronies and former aides.

"Thinking outside the think tank"

Not one to rest when America's national security can be used as a cover for making a buck, Cunningham was also steering Pentagon money to a second tiny “defense contractor,” MZM Inc, which had the great good fortune to go from zero dollars in Federal contracts to $169 million in two short years, through the simple expedient of indulging Cunningham’s taste for expensive yachts and a new $2 million dollar mansion in ritzy Rancho Santa Fe, California, to go with the trophy wife, also on the payroll.

Here's a photo taken of a Washington D.C. bask thrown by MZM Inc to further U.S.-Panama friendship. MZM Inc founder Mitchell Wade is the beefy fellow with the self-satisfied smile.

And why not? He's dining out on your money.

While the story has its humorous aspects, the money involved is nothing if not serious... A (highly preliminary) total of almost $700 million earmarked for national security going to “defense contractors” which just a few years earlier didn’t exist which provide services the Pentagon didn’t ask for or presumably need.

The companies involved would also share another characteristic as well: they were very very grateful.

The point man on the Group W “account” for the Alexander Strategy Group, which received almost $200,000 of gratitude for "client services," was former DeLay aide Karl Gallant, who apparently made a specialty of stealing money from widows and orphans, having signed Enron Corp. to a $750,000 lobbying contract a few years earlier.

(Maybe he can someday share a cell with Ken Lay. We hope its not in one of those federal tennis camps. Pelican Bay might do nicely.)

"Eschewing the soft sell"

"Buckham and that crew, they were Tom DeLay,” a senior GOP House member, careful to remain anonymous, told Congressional Quarterly Weekly.

“The Alexander lobbyists' sales pitch was, ‘Either you hire me or DeLay is going to screw you,’” said a top Republican lobbyist. "It was not really a soft sell."

Alas for Karl Gallant, his chances of pleading lack of premeditation are dimmed somewhat by his participation way back in 1990 in a Heritage Foundation report entitled, no doubt with tongue place firmly in cheek,

We only mention this because we found it so funny: "Defense contractor cum lobbyist" Brent Wilkes was recently appointed by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to the State Race Track Leasing Commission, which oversees thoroughbred racing at Del Mar Race Track near San Diego.

Del Mar of course was where FBI head J. Edgar Hoover used to vacation yearly as the guest of Texas oil man Clint Murchison. A Senate committee discovered in 1955 that 20 per cent of Murchison’s Oil Lease Company was owned by Mob Boss Vito Genovese.

A sordid episode involving Hoover at Del Mar was relayed to author Anthony Summers in “The Secret Life of J Edgar Hoover," by veteran film producer Joe Pasternak.

"He was a homosexual," Pasternak told Summers. "Every year he used to come down to the Del Mar racetrack with a different boy. He was caught in a bathroom by a newspaperman. They made sure he didn't speak. . . Nobody dared say anything because he was so powerful."

La plus ca change.

"Great humanitarians know how to spread it around."

Wilkes is also the proud papa of his very own foundation (de rigueur in certain circles.) The Wilkes Foundation sponsored the second annual San Diego Tribute to Heroes Gala recently, we discovered. It honored the no doubt heroic Congressman Duncan Hunter, who just happens, as they say, to currently be chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

For the Congressman's sake, we hope he doesn't dock a yacht anywhere near Duke Cunningham's

We thought he was exaggerating when former Ambassador Wilson wrote in his recent book that the sordid spectacle we have all been forced to witness has been caused by “a small pack of zealots whose dedication has spanned decades, and that through years of selective recruitment has become a government cult with cells in most of the national security system.”

Guess what? He's not...

A news account in the San Diego Union-Tribune about the Lear jet used by Cunningham and DeLay, paid for by you and I from money "passed through" to San Diego "businessman" Wilkes, told of a flight DeLay flew from Dulles Airport in Washington, D.C., to John Wayne Airport in Orange County to appear at a campaign dinner for Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach.

Dana Rohrabacher will appear again (several times) in our story... He gave a sterling personal recommendation, for example, to Adam Kidan, the "dunsky (John Gotti's phrase) about to be indicted for paying for the brutal murder of Sun Cruz Casino Line owner Gus Boulis... with a check.

The original bad penny.

Rohrabacher was there when the cult first began to do business as The Enterprise, in Angola, for example, with Jack Abramoff... and Oliver North.
The same group involved in the Cunningham affair will soon be seen to have their fingerprints all over the Boulis hit, as well as a host of recent activities of individuals for whom the noun “baseball bat” is a verb...

As in: "We shoulda baseball-batted him."

Emilia DiSanto is a staffer on Capital Hill working for Senator Charles Grassley, currently investigating Abramoff. She was attacked with a baseball bat on November 8 by a mysterious masked man trying to hide his identity by wearing a hood and black gloves, who said nothing and made no demands before attacking the 49-year-old staffer. The FBI is investigating it as being “work-related.”

Or FRANK Mosco, a whistleblower whose testimony convicted another figure in the Cunningham scandal, a man named Thomas Kontogiannis, to whom Cunningham sold his yacht at an inflated price, just as he’d sold his house to Mitchell Wade of MZM Inc.

Today Mosco won't leave his home without his bulletproof vest. He started wearing body armor a few months ago after four goons attacked him on a Queens street, bashing him on the head, pummeling him to the ground and throwing him into a van, where he was threatened to "keep [his] mouth shut."

The brazen beating occurred just days after Queens District Attorney Richard Brown issued grand jury subpoenas to targets of a massive kickback and corruption probe which eventually fingered Duke Cunningham.

When Cunningham learned that the prosecutor in the case against Kontogiannis knew of the attack, he wrote telling him that there may be a political agenda against the school official (who he now admits had been paying him bribes) by what he termed a "disgruntled contractor (Mosco.)

A crime spree by the "baseball bat boys"

A short list of recent violent crime suspected of having been committed by Abramoff associates makes for fascinating reading, and we will regale you with it at a later date. But we just wanted to mention it now, in case anyone thinks we may be being too hard on a former war hero who's become a broken man who simply misplaced his moral compass, or as Rush Limbaugh characterized it, "made a mistake."

Locking your keys in your car is "making a mistake."

When the San Diego Union-Tribune detailed charges of Congressman Cunningham’s questionable activates in December 1997, Cunningham told the paper’s reporter that anyone who questioned his actions in lobbying for ADCS could “go to hell.”

After Cunningham's sniveling performance yesterday, its safe to assume he was still at that point exhibiting the bravado of the not-yet indicted.

Less we forget, most of this happened during a time period in which the U.S. was to war, after 3000 innocent people were murdered in an attack which our nation, which spends more on defense than most of the rest of the world combined, was unable to thwart.

Its a good thing for Cunningham that people seem willing to cut him some slack, because of his service as an ace Navy pilot during the Vietnam War, a decade-long attempt to keep the U.S. West Coast from being invaded by fleets of Viet Cong sampans that somebody must have feared mightily, given the costs of that struggle to our nation.

Otherwise there might be calls for Cunningham to be indicted for treason.

President in Disneyland speech

Didn't play to well in Peoria apparently. Oh well. There's always Orange County...Oh wait.
A Pathetic Performance by Alan Bock

I really should have learned by now. The White House offers some tantalizing hints that this time the president is really going to lay things out in a way the American people can understand, demonstrate that he is conversant with the facts on the ground and how to overcome them. He might even offer a modicum of frankness that demonstrates he understands not everything has gone swimmingly but we are fixing problems. There's even the hint that he will offer something of an exit strategy that involves a draw-down of troops.

Silly me.

http://www.antiwar.com/bock/?articleid=8195

'...isn't it rather pathetic that this president now appears in public only before a military crowd? (All right, he also spoke before federal border enforcement officers and a fundraiser for a conservative Colorado congresswoman.) It suggests that even though the president himself seems to be securely insulated from reality – and to be fair, that's a phenomenon that happens to most presidents, although this one has cultivated and even demanded it from the outset – somebody at the White House can read the polls and decipher the signs suggesting that this war and this president are not exactly popular these days.

From a PR perspective, there are advantages for a president to speak at military installations, but there are downsides as well. On the positive side, you can reliably anticipate that at the very least the crowd will not erupt in catcalls, and it is likely that there will be genuine enthusiasm, especially at a service academy where auditors have not yet had the sometimes exhilarating but definitely fantasy-puncturing experience of actual combat. And there is a substantial segment of the population that still views the military with something approaching reverence, and will see a president explicitly identifying with it as a sign that he is the right kind of guy.

On the other hand, there is also a substantial segment – although few may be on the fence about Dubya these days – that sees such explicit identification with the military as distasteful if not downright alarming. You don't have to be trembling in fear of an imminent military dictatorship to see that there's something exploitative in the appearances, sort of like a CEO facing a scandal only appearing before groups of employees whose very livelihood depends on him emerging relatively unscathed.

The president is in part using the military, which is supposed to be the supremely nonpartisan institution dedicated to the country rather than to a particular president or party (I'm old enough to remember when career officers made it a point of pride not to vote because they were pledged to obey the commander in chief and didn't want to have even the scintilla of mixed feelings about loyalty that might arise from having voted for his opponent) to help revive his sagging political fortunes. This is supremely cynical, and there must be some in those crowds who recognize and resent it, but they can be counted on to swallow their resentment and be polite if not enthusiastic.

More than cynical, however, the image of a president who avoids crowds of civilians and ordinary American workers and taxpayers is pathetic. I don't know if Seymour Hersh is right that, unlike LBJ at a similar point in his presidency, this president is blissfully unaware that he has become a prisoner in the White House...'

'...the president – I don't know about others in the administration – still seems not just clueless but determined not to learn or to know anything that conflicts with the rosy scenario he tries to convey to the American people...'

'...The president will have to do a lot better than this if he wants to restore flagging public support for this ill-advised war. I think he's a goner, that he will serve out his term as an increasingly ineffective and pathetic figure...'

Maybe Florida Disneyworld next time? Cane' season over Jebbie boy?

Punch and Judy show

Dowd: We've moved on and everything's fantastic at NYT
Texas Monthly
Dowd
From Maureen Dowd's TV interview with Texas Monthly editor Evan Smith:

SMITH: Anything about Judith Miller or about her reporting or that incident that you hadn’t already written? Because you have been quite open about your feelings about that.
DOWD: Judith who? ...
SMITH: You really are moving on.
DOWD: As Bill Keller said in an interview the other day, he has Judy fatigue. I do, too. Everything I had to say was in the column. And Judy is a very forceful, intriguing woman and she’s going to have a great second chapter in whatever she decides to do.
SMITH: Did you read her response to what you wrote on her web site?
DOWD: Well, she emailed me that after I did it. So she emailed me a few times and I emailed her. So more email pals.
SMITH: Are you? Well, pals of some sort anyway.
DOWD: Don’t start a catfight, Evan.
SMITH: No. No. I’m just a spectator, Maureen.
DOWD: As Seinfeld said, men love catfights because they always think that somebody’s going to end up kissing at the end. But that’s not going to happen.

Posted at 1:20:05 PM POYNTERS

Check out this thread for a laugh...

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/001129.html

' Don't ever go against the family! '

Laos bombing levels and Death squads

Robert Dreyfuss has a scoop in The American Prospect:

"The Prospect has learned that part of a secret $3 billion in new funds—tucked away in the $87 billion Iraq appropriation that Congress approved in early November—will go toward the creation of a paramilitary unit manned by militiamen associated with former Iraqi exile groups. Experts say it could lead to a wave of extrajudicial killings, not only of armed rebels but of nationalists, other opponents of the U.S. occupation and thousands of civilian Baathists—up to 120,000 of the estimated 2.5 million former Baath Party members in Iraq."

So with this recycled Phoenix assassination program and Cambodian style bombing runs on the terrorists sanctuaries in Syria, Iran and all the other countries bombed during the initial ' liberation'... ( The greatest since Mussolini liberated Abbyssinia? )
countries like Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, ' Iraqization' is proceeding apace.

Everything old is new again.

Advancing in diversity

Striking in unison

December 2, 2005 - Profusion of Rebel Groups Helps Them Survive in Iraq
By DEXTER FILKINS - BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 1 - Here is a small sampling of the insurgent groups that have claimed responsibility for attacks on Americans and Iraqis in the last few months:

Supporters of the Sunni People. The Men's Faith Brigade. The Islamic Anger. Al Baraa bin Malik Suicide Brigade. The Tawid Lions of Abdullah ibn al Zobeir. While some of them, like the Suicide Brigade, claim an affiliation with Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia and Al Qaeda claims them, others say they have acted alone or under the guidance of another group.

While on Wednesday President Bush promised nothing less than "complete victory" over the Iraqi insurgency, the apparent proliferation of militant groups offers perhaps the best explanation as to why the insurgency has been so hard to destroy.

The Bush administration has long maintained, and Mr. Bush reiterated in his speech Wednesday, that the insurgency comprises three elements: disaffected Sunni Arabs, or "rejectionists"; former Hussein government loyalists; and foreign-born terrorists affiliated with Al Qaeda.

Iraqi and American officials in Iraq say the single most important fact about the insurgency is that it consists not of a few groups but of dozens, possibly as many as 100. And it is not, as often depicted, a coherent organization whose members dutifully carry out orders from above but a far-flung collection of smaller groups that often act on their own or come together for a single attack, the officials say. Each is believed to have its own leader and is free to act on its own.

Highly visible groups like Al Qaeda, Ansar al Sunna and the Victorious Army Group appear to act as fronts, the Iraqis and the Americans say, providing money, general direction and expertise to the smaller groups, but often taking responsibility for their attacks by broadcasting them across the globe.

"The leaders usually don't have anything to do with details," said Abdul Kareem al-Eniezi, the Iraqi minister for national security. "Sometimes they will give the smaller groups a target, or a type of target. The groups aren't connected to each other. They are not that organized."

Some experts and officials say there are important exceptions: that Al Qaeda's leaders, for instance, are deeply involved in spectacular suicide bombings, the majority of which are still believed to be carried out by foreigners. They also say some of the smaller groups that claim responsibility for attacks may be largely fictional, made up of ragtag groups of fighters hoping to make themselves seem more formidable and numerous than they really are.

But whatever the appearances, American and Iraqi officials agree on the essential structure of the Iraqi insurgency: it is horizontal as opposed to hierarchical, and ad hoc as opposed to unified. They say this central characteristic, similar to that of terrorist organizations in Europe and Asia, is what is making the Iraqi insurgency so difficult to destroy. Attack any single part of it, and the rest carries on largely untouched. It cannot be decapitated, because the insurgency, for the most part, has no head. Only recently, American and Iraqi experts say, have they begun to grasp the new organizational structure that, among other things, is making the insurgency so difficult to stop.

( Reminds me of Aqulilla/Rondfeldt's Netwars spiel )

"There is no center of gravity, no leadership, no hierarchy; they are more a constellation than an organization," said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at the Rand Corporation. "They have adopted a structure that assures their longevity."

Yeah...very RANDy.